Scenes from a House in Ekaterinburg in July, 100 Years Ago

Book review: Last Days of the Romanovs, by Helen Rappaport

Russian historian Helen Rappaport writes a tightly focused, streamlined account of the last two weeks that the family of Nicholas Romanov was alive, held captive at the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg in Siberia, a building known by its very Soviet name as the “House of Special Purpose”. 100 years ago last month, the Romanov family and several of their servants, 11 people in all, were brutally executed in the cellar of the Ipatiev House, their bodies first thrown down a mineshaft before being ultimately buried or burned in the nearby Koptyaki Forest.

After introducing the setting and before getting to what’s known of those last days, Rappaport inserts a few chapters providing some brief portraits of the family and some of their servants who’d followed them into exile. These are brief but telling enough to capture much of what made these personalities what they were and explaining their behavior and mindsets in exile, even without a reader having much background in Romanov history. At the same time, they’re not so detailed or repetitive to lose a reader who does have that familiarity.

These include background on why Nicholas was disliked as a ruler, forced as he was into a position he never really wanted and more consumed with his family life than politics, including his worries over Alexey’s (his and Alexandra’s only son and heir to the throne) hemophilia, which was kept secret from the Russian people. Rappaport summarizes Nicholas’s unpopularity brilliantly, capturing what it was about both his leadership skills (or lack thereof) and personality that rubbed the Russians the wrong way:

Traditionally Russians had long since seemed to respond best to ‘a touch of madness or magic in their rulers’, and Nicholas had neither.

At the point of their exile, Lenin and the Bolsheviks were in charge, and the Romanov family was seen as a potential rallying point for the Whites. As the Romanovs languished in the Ipatiev House, the Czech Whites were closing in, and the atmosphere everywhere was tense as the family hoped this would be their salvation, or that one of many haphazard, half-baked plots to rescue them would materialize in combination with the Czechs’ advance. Meanwhile the Bolsheviks grew increasingly anxious about the same, with the Romanovs’ freedom seen as both symbolism for the opposition and a very real threat to their political power.

It’s all much more complicated than this, but Rappaport keeps it simple and relevant, which makes this such an excellent book to read to get a just-the-facts idea of what happened and why. It’s very accessible and informative.

The bulk of the book, aside from the personality sketches of those imprisoned in the house, describes what those last weeks were like, as the guardianship of the prisoners changed and the noose increasingly tightened, their freedoms became further restricted, and all of the measures they took, insufficient though they were, to cope.

Their world was now far too small; all that was left to them was the meticulous daily habit of writing their diaries.

Rappaport is deft at making the claustrophobic atmosphere the Romanovs endured felt, in painstaking detail and description, with lines like this. It’s hard to imagine a family of seven who’d ruled over the largest country on earth being confined to a few rooms on one floor of a house, guns trained on them from outside and from the windows above. Whatever Nicholas and Alexandra’s personal and professional faults and failings, their world was a vast and sprawling one. To picture living like this, with only short bursts of activity walking in a small yard for a few minutes a day and constant monitoring, only their religious devotion, some crafting and diary writing allowed, is surreal to comprehend.

Then there’s the scene of the execution. I’m an avid reader/watcher of true crime and nonfiction in general that happens to portray graphic scenes, so I consider myself able to tolerate reading about murder and violence. But the description of how this went down, even though I already knew most of it, was excruciating to read. I had to pause and pick up again countless times to get through it, and it’s haunting. However terrible you think this scene must have been, it was worse.

The entire operation of the execution itself went disastrously, as the guards forming the firing squad, cleaning the basement room, and attempting to dispose of the bodies were completely drunk, nervous and stressed – all of which was made worse by the bloody turn the killings took, when many of the victims didn’t die quickly or easily. The grand duchesses had jewels sewn into their bodices, which deflected bullets, and the guards’ drunkenness and smoke from the gunfire distorted their aim, leading to many of those in the cellar being bayoneted to death. This isn’t even touching on the incompetency of their disposal methods, as Rappaport writes, “It was now clear that the greatest moment in Russian revolutionary history was on the brink of being turned into farce.”

Rappaport answers a lot of questions that I’ve had here. One was to do with Rasputin – even today the popular consensus is that no one is really sure how Rasputin was able to help the Tsarevich Alexey when he was gravely ill from hemophilia (this mysterious ability being the reason why Rasputin’s presence in their inner circle, a point of much contention among advisors, politicians and the Russian public, was tolerated). I’d read elsewhere it was because Rasputin always ordered the doctors to leave him alone during a fit or illness, thus ensuring he wasn’t given medications that might’ve been worsening the condition instead of alleviating it.

But Rappaport goes further, postulating that Rasputin was able to help by calming Alexey, almost to a hypnotic state, and regulating his breathing, which would’ve slowed his heart rate and pumped his blood slower, thus not exacerbating his condition. Suddenly what had always been a strange mystery made so much logical sense.

I’ve also always wondered who really gave the order for their execution, because no paper trail or explicit account of it exists (purposely). She clears that up as best as history allows too:

When it came to ordering any draconian measures, Lenin was a coward. He always operated with extreme caution, his favored method being to issue such instructions in coded telegrams (insisting that the original and even the telegraph ribbon on which it was sent be destroyed.) … it is more than likely too that he often gave verbal instructions via his trusted right-hand man Sverdlov … Ekaterinburg would carry out the necessary liquidation and, in the absence of documentation to prove otherwise, would also carry the blame in the eyes of the world. Within the new Soviet Russia, the kudos for this historic act of national vengeance would be enormous.

In other words, it was probably Lenin, but he cunningly made sure the blood would never be traceably on his hands, as well as assuring his political standing.

Twenty-three steps – one for every year of Nicholas’s disastrous reign – now led him and his family to their collective fate.

Rappaport is a brilliant, thorough historian, able to weave in so much detail, emotion and atmosphere – thanks in large part to the Romanovs’ extensive diaries. This book was published in 2009, a time when their last remains – Maria and Alexey’s bodies purposely burned and buried away from the others to sow confusion and help avoid identification – had been recently unearthed and identified. So the persistent myth of anyone escaping the massacre is put to rest here, as well as many others dispelled in favor of meticulously researched historical truth. Rappaport is no-nonsense in her handling of the myths and legends about the family and especially the heavily obfuscated stories surrounding the end of their dynasty, but the truth is more fascinating anyway.

I finally dug this off my shelf when the July anniversary came around, and it also helped me decide not to read her most recent, The Race to Save the Romanovs. Excellent as this book was, the weakest parts were her forays into these doomed plots, often involving Nicholas’s cousin George in England, and various cousin-drama stories from around Europe, where this sprawling extended family held power in multiple countries. They were just not interesting to read about. It did make me very glad that fickle, jealous, melodramatic monarchies don’t hold this kind of power in Europe anymore.

Detailed but accessible and captivating, tightly structured account of the Romanov dynasty’s end – its lead-up, before, the tension-filled final days, and what transpired on the site and the long process of discovery, identification and myth long after they were gone. 4/5

The Last Days of the Romanovs:
Tragedy at Ekaterinburg

by Helen Rappaport
published 2009 by St. Martin’s Press

Affiliate links from Book Depositorya great site (I buy there) offering free shipping, worldwide. I get a small percentage of the sale – you pay nothing extra – if you use my links to buy books seen here. I’m never paid to promote or review any title.

22 thoughts on “Scenes from a House in Ekaterinburg in July, 100 Years Ago

  1. I read The Romanov Sisters by the same author, but I don’t think I enjoyed it as much as you did this one. I felt it got bogged down in details and so I’m hesitant to pick another book by the author on the same subject.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I haven’t gotten to that one yet, but I really enjoyed her Caught in the Revolution. I didn’t like the parts that dealt with the plots about saving the Romanovs though, and reading the details felt painfully bogged down in those parts, so I could see that happening with her work. Maybe it has to do with how interesting the subject matter is that she’s detailing? It helped me realize that I definitely don’t want to read her most recent book about the plots to save them!

      Like

    1. Thank you so much! It’s a great one. Did you read that new one already? I don’t think I want to because I didn’t like the threads about those plots covered in this book, it just wasn’t as interesting as what was happening in Russia and the myths she dispelled, I loved that about her telling of this story.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Excellent review. I love Rappaport’s writing and, though my interest in Russian history has been minimal in the past (it’s been growing a lot the last two or three years), she has made it absolutely fascinating in her wonderfully researched and very detailed books.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! This is my second of hers, I really liked Caught in the Revolution too. I agree, she has a great writing style and she makes what’s quite a dense and complicated history very accessible.

      Like

  3. fascinating review Ren and just like you i always was fascinated about the Romanov family tragic fate.
    this book indicates unlike Democracy in authoritarian governments if you win you win big and if you lose you wouldn’t only lose your position but also your head.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Romanovs are really so fascinating! I think it’s a widespread fascination too, there was so much interest last month at the time of the 100 year anniversary of their deaths and the Revolution. And very true what you said about losing big! Nicholas was far from a great ruler but I always found it sad that he’d never wanted the position in the first place, it seemed almost a relief to him when he was removed from power. I think they hoped for a long time that they’d be allowed to just live out their lives quietly somewhere and he wouldn’t have challenged Bolshevik rule, but they were seen as too much of a liability in case the opposition used them as a symbolic rallying point for restoring the monarchy. Tragic that his children suffered so much, this book was tough to read in parts.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks a lot for answering back Ren and yeah the execution of the family is the hardest part to read.
        Am looking forward to read your next Rappaport which I still didn’t read but I look forward to read your thought about cowardice of Britain king to save his cousin from the Bolshevik for the fear of losing his throne

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I’m not sure I’m going to read that one actually, are you? It’s a crazy story (George and Nicholas almost looked like twins!) but I felt like I got enough of it from what she told in this book. I’m not sure I want to read a whole book of it. We’ll see! 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Well no one can predict what’s your next reading Ren but if you read am sure we will enjoy reading your review.
        Well not in the recent future as i am reading currently book which tells the story of Assassins and how they shaped Islamic history and politics.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s absolutely a good place to start – it’s not overly long and covers some background essentials without going too in-depth into anything that might make you lose interest. But I do think the best Romanov book I’ve read is Robert Massie’s Nicholas and Alexandra, and I read that one without too much background. It’s older but still such an excellent read!

      Like

  4. Great review! This sounds like a fascinating account, well researched. I picked up in my Russian Revolution reading the same point about Rasputin’s calming effect on Alexey, I think from Orlando Figes’ account in A People’s Tragedy. It seems more believable than some of the more woo-woo explanations…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much! I haven’t read A People’s Tragedy yet, but I liked some of Figes’s others, Natasha’s Dance and The Whisperers. I just liked here how she really explained it so thoroughly, not really leaving anything vague to wonder about, which is where I think some other explanations make room for the woo-woo details to fill in the gaps!! This book was great for how many myths she debunked about the family with tons of details to back them up, it’s a great read!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s