Disaster and After: A Chernobyl Deep Dive

Book review: Midnight in Chernobyl, by Adam Higginbotham (Amazon / Book Depository)

Senior Lieutenant Alexander Logachev loved radiation the way other men loved their wives.

So begins Adam Higginbotham’s exhaustive account of the April 1986 Chernobyl disaster, recounting a blow-by-blow of the unfolding incident and the monumental effects of the aftermath, amidst the context of Soviet politics and the USSR’s place on the world stage.

The tone varies; at times it’s storyteller-rich, as quoted above or in lovely, evocative lines like: “At the slow beat of approaching rotor blades, black birds rose into the sky, scattering over the frozen meadows and the pearly knots of creeks and ponds lacing the Pripyat River basin.” I was mesmerized by this writing in places, which makes the portrayal of this village, soon to become synonymous with nuclear disaster, or “nukemare” as the New York Post elegantly called it, so vivid. Chernobyl had amusingly even been featured in a glossy “Soviet Life” magazine in a detailed report about “the wonders of nuclear energy”.

When the meltdown in reactor 4 happened, it wasn’t only a shock and surprise, but it challenged the foundations that this new, safe energy industry was built on, not to mention the new policy of transparency that Mikhil Gorbachev had enacted for the Soviet Union beginning the previous year.

And from somewhere in the heart of the tangled mass of rebar and shattered concrete – from deep inside the ruins of Unit Four, where the reactor was supposed to be – Alexander Yuvchenko could see something more frightening still: a shimmering pillar of ethereal blue-white light, reaching straight up into the night sky, disappearing into infinity. Delicate and strange, and encircled by a flickering spectrum of colors conjured by flames from within the burning building and superheated chunks of metal and machinery, the beautiful phosphorescence transfixed Yuvchenko for a few seconds.

Losing face in the world’s eyes was unacceptable, never mind what the magnitude of the disaster would mean for people in the unstable USSR who’d been assured nuclear energy was a safe and vastly promising industry for the future. Infamous Soviet censorship had already been at work downplaying the incident at Three Mile Island in the US, for fear of shattering this carefully cultivated illusion: “As bad as it made the United States look, news of Three Mile Island was censored inside the USSR, for fear it could tarnish the ostensibly spotless record of the peaceful atom.”

Information was still scant, and conflicting: the armed forces said one thing, scientists another. Now they needed to decide what – or whether – to tell the Soviet people about the accident. For Gorbachev, this was a sudden and unexpected test of the new openness and transparent government he had promised the Party conference just a month earlier; since then, glasnost had been nothing more than a slogan…the traditional reflexes of secrecy and paranoia were deeply engrained.

But for those who actually understood what they were working with, illusion didn’t exist. The hidden problem in the aftermath was the party machinations that allowed the management of the meltdown, and those who assisted in the clean-up, to veer so tragically off course. We get a lot of this stark, affecting perspective here, like when Senior Unit Engineer Boris Stolyarchuk was struck by one thought upon realizing the scale of what had happened: “I’m so young, and it’s all over.”

Even after those on the scene were coming to terms with the reality, particularly when using dosimeters, that the ground radiation was at critical levels, it was hard to comprehend: one surveyor had to impress on a Party chief that the shocking readings he was showing were in roentgen, not milliroentgen. Those at the top insisted on “a can-do shock-work action plan of fantasy and denial,” which employees were encouraged to report cheerfully to Communist Party chiefs, despite the obvious manifesting itself all around the exclusion zone.

There were signs that not everything in the city was quite as it should be. The technician’s next-door neighbor, an electrical assembly man, spurned the beach that morning in favor of the roof of his apartment building, where he lay down on a rubber mat to sunbathe. He stayed up there for a while and noticed that he began to tan right away. Almost immediately, his skin gave off a burning smell. At one point, he came down for a break, and his neighbor found him oddly excited and good humored, as if he’d been drinking.

As informative and readable as I found some parts of the book, others were difficult to process with very little scientific background of my own as basis. That’s more on me, but worth mentioning for other readers who might similarly be lacking here. The author starts out explaining the science behind nuclear energy, beginning with the basics, incredibly well – I couldn’t believe how clearly he wrote this introduction to the topic and how much I could understand of a subject that’s always felt dense.

But it wasn’t an understanding I could maintain as the details became increasingly complex, and I found myself avoiding the book because I struggled to make any progress through sections that were nuclear- or technology-focused, as well written as they may be. So I’d caution that prior knowledge here is necessary, and if you don’t have that, then at least have the patience and focus to concentrate intensely on these parts, which are numerous and lengthy enough to disturb your reading experience if you’re not processing them.

Nevertheless, it’s a deeply comprehensive telling of this incident and its complex, frightening aftermath, not to mention the sociopolitical circumstances that allowed it to go wrong and wronger. If Svetlana Alexievich’s Voices from Chernobyl illustrates the human effects, sometimes dreamy and emotionally told, of the disaster and the world it created, Midnight in Chernobyl charts the fact-packed narrative from start to finish, including some very personal perspectives, the political machinations, and the technology underlying it.

Midnight in Chernobyl:
The Untold Story of the World’s Greatest Nuclear Disaster

by Adam Higginbotham
published February 12, 2019 by Simon & Schuster

Amazon / Book Depository

I received an advance copy courtesy of the publisher for unbiased review.


28 thoughts on “Disaster and After: A Chernobyl Deep Dive

Add yours

    1. I’ve wanted to understand more about it too, and the parts dealing with the political actions (or inaction) were completely fascinating here. Plus the personal accounts were excellent (but terrifying.) But yikes, the science was just beyond my mental capacities. You should try out Svetlana Alexievich’s Voices From Chernobyl if you haven’t read it already. It’s an oral history with the survivors, families of the first responders, etc. It’s heartbreaking but an amazing accounting of that time and how the people lived afterwards.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m the same, I prefer that the science doesn’t get too technical. This started out brilliantly, I was surprised how understandable and readable it was, but it fell apart for me later. I think it depends on what outside knowledge you’re already bringing to it…mine is next to nonexistent so it was too much for me. On the other hand, the narrative of what people were doing and their reflections is excellent. It was a mixed bag, maybe try to page through a copy in a store and see what you think about the denser sections.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Well Allo, Allo,
    It’s been a long time! Today must be the day for the review of atomic particles, radiation, and the aftermath. I seem to be on a “Disasters in History” kick of late with my reading, perhaps I’ll add this title as well. The political aspects and the science sound absolutely fascinating to my analytical and mathematics prone noggin! Thanks for the recommendation, and it is good to read your words again. My best to you and your loved ones.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This sounds interesting – I have limited knowledge of the Chernobyl disaster as it occurred several years before I was born and I seem to find that I’m pretty sketchy on history in the 80s-mid-90s, so this would definitely fill in a gap of knowledge I have.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s the same for me, I’m captivated by the topic but got a bit lost here. Svetlana Alexievich’s Voices From Chernobyl is a great book that takes a strictly personal angle, via oral histories, to relate narratives of what happened and how it affected the people involved after. It’s incredibly moving.


  3. Thanks for your review. I have some science background so I hope it doesn’t put me off too much. Moreover, I love dystopian themes and this is right up there as an actual event that occurred, rather than fiction.
    I think I will give it a go and see how I get on. I will also get the other book if I can that you mention in the comment earlier about the personal experiences. Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Definitely try it, I think you won’t have any issue at all if you bring some scientific background to it. And you’re so right, it has such an eerie dystopian feeling running throughout! Even more terrifying that it was real.

      Voices from Chernobyl is an incredible book, I absolutely recommend it. It’s very moving but also revealing. You get a lot of the deeply personal stories in this book too, but that one puts the focus there entirely. Hope you like them!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I don’t know if I’ll be able to enjoy the more detailed science bits or not! I typically like reading about science, but this particular topic isn’t something where I have much relevant background knowledge. I loved the language in the first few quotes you shared though and it makes me want to pick this up, even though I’ve already read a few books on this disaster.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Maybe just having a more science-focused mindset would be helpful here anyway, even if the background isn’t exactly the same. I’m not sure, it was just too technically over my head in too many places, as much as I wanted to understand something more about it and why it happened how it did. But the personal accounts are written in an extraordinary narrative style, that was the highlight for me. His writing is so impressive.


  5. This seems good. Or okay this seems rather odd… Like the technical side of things fascinates, however is that what’s important. It is and then Russia still has plants exactly in same condition as Chernobyl. Anyway I think I’m at my limit with books and documentaries on Chernobyl. I just can’t stomach them anymore.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I can completely understand, there’s only so much you can absorb about a topic like this, it’s not easy. I guess the technical aspect is interesting especially for people who understand it and can appreciate the magnitude of what went wrong. I didn’t realize they still had plants in this condition! That’s alarming…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: